Classic theories of crowd behavior (G. Le Bon, G. Tarde, S. Moscovici) emphasize its irrationality, deindividuation, and tendency to destructive actions. However, modern research in social psychology and neuroscience demonstrates that powerful forms of altruism —无私的帮助陌生人，在高度匿名性和压力的情况下 — can also manifest in crowds. This phenomenon represents a paradox: an environment considered fertile ground for aggression becomes a catalyst for heroism. Altruism in the crowd is not an exception, but a systemic property that arises when biological predispositions, social context, and extreme circumstances collide.
The key mechanism explaining altruistic impulses in crowds is the empathetic response, which has a neurobiological basis in humans.
Mirror neurons and the insula. When observing someone else's suffering, the same neural networks are activated in us as when we experience our own pain (anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex). In a crowd, where emotions are transmitted non-verbally through mimicry, posture, and cries (emotional contagion), this activation can be particularly strong and immediate. The crowd does not "depersonalize" at this moment, but rather hyperpersonalizes the pain of others, making it physically tangible.
Oxytocin and dopamine. A stressful situation in a crowd can trigger the release of oxytocin — a neuropeptide associated not only with attachment but also with increased trust and readiness for cooperation in the face of external threats. At the same time, the act of helping triggers the reward system (ventral striatum), releasing dopamine. In this way, the brain "rewards" the individual for prosocial action even in a chaotic environment.
Interesting fact: A study conducted after the Boston Marathon bombings in 2013 showed that contrary to expectations of panic flight, many witnesses immediately rushed to help the injured, often at the risk of their own safety. Analysis of behavior revealed that the first responders were often people with experience in high-risk environments (military, medical personnel), whose neural response patterns to crisis were already "trained".
The classic experiment by Darley and Latane (the phenomenon of the "bystander effect") showed: the more people present at an emergency situation, the less likely it is that one person will offer help, due to diffusion of responsibility (distribution of guilt among all) and social influence (the inaction of others is perceived as a signal that help is not needed).
However, in real, highly emotional, and dangerous situations in crowds, this effect can be overcome:
Clear identification of the victim and clarity of the situation. When a suffering person is clearly visible and their need is obvious ("a person has fallen, he's bleeding"), cognitive uncertainty decreases. The crowd does not "freeze", but mobilizes.
Formation of a "rescue team" on the spot. A single proactive person who begins to act immediately removes the diffusion of responsibility for others. Their actions become the social norm for a micro-group within the crowd. Immediate cooperation of strangers, united by a common goal, arises.
Redefining social identity. In the moment of a catastrophe (terrorist attack, natural disaster), identities such as "fan", "tourist", "passerby" are replaced by more general ones — "victim" or "rescuer". This creates a powerful sense of community ("we are all in the same boat") and strengthens mutual assistance.
Example: During the flood in Krymsk in 2012, local residents, themselves in a difficult situation, saved neighbors and strangers with their boats and floating means, forming spontaneous rescue teams. In conditions of catastrophe, the crowd often demonstrates not chaos, but emergent self-organization.
Cultural norms. In societies with a high degree of collectivism (for example, in Japan), prosocial behavior in crowds is more expected and regulated by internal group harmony norms. After the earthquake in Japan in 2011, remarkable examples of organization and mutual assistance were noted in long lines for food and water, without panic and aggression.
Charismatic leader. In a crowd, a figure may spontaneously emerge, taking on the coordination (screaming "I'm a doctor, I need two men!"). This person breaks the cycle of uncertainty and gives others a clear role, transforming the passive mass into an active rescue network.
Level of threat. Paradoxically, moderate threat can increase altruism (mobilization of resources), while extreme, panic threat can suppress it (activating the "fight or flight" survival mode).
From the perspective of evolutionary psychology, altruism in the crowd can be considered as a manifestation of mechanisms honed for group survival.
Reciprocal altruism (R. Trivers): In conditions of close interaction (such as in a crowd), helping a stranger can be an instinctual investment in future interaction — "today I help you, tomorrow you or your kin will help me or mine."
Group selection: Groups within which cooperation and mutual assistance in critical situations are widespread have a greater chance of survival and reproduction than groups where each person is for themselves. Spontaneous altruism in the crowd may be a remnant of this ancient group instinct.
Altruism in the crowd destroys the simplified myth of the "irrational crowd". It demonstrates that even in conditions of anonymity and stress, human psychology retains the ability to empathize, learn socially quickly, and cooperate. This state is the result of a complex interaction:
Automatic neurobiological reaction to someone else's pain.
Social-psychological switching from diffusion to acceptance of responsibility.
Thus, the crowd not only serves as a potential source of danger but also as a reserve of spontaneous solidarity. Its behavior is not a predetermined scenario, but a dynamic system where an altruistic act by one person can become a trigger for the transformation of the entire group from a passive gathering into an active community of rescuers. This demonstrates a deeply rooted in human nature potential for prosociality, which in a critical moment can outweigh egotistical impulses.
New publications: |
Popular with readers: |
News from other countries: |
 |
Editorial Contacts |
About · News · For Advertisers |
 Digital Library of Finland ® All rights reserved.
2025-2026, ELIB.FI is a part of Libmonster, international library network (open map) Preserving Finland's heritage |
|
US-Great Britain
Sweden
Serbia
Russia
Belarus
Ukraine
Kazakhstan
Moldova
Tajikistan
Estonia
Russia-2
Belarus-2
